Optimizing technological elements when growing cucumbers in non-heated green houses
Boyan Arnaoudov

, Hriska Boteva

, Yanina Arnaoudova

Abstract: The experimental work was conducted in non-heated glass house Venlo type in Maritsa VCRI – Plovdiv, with green house cucumbers Defense F1 variety, grown in three density of sowing: 1.44; 2.16 and 2.88 plant/m2. According to the plant density, proportionally were applied three levels of nutrition with NK (100, 150 and 200%). This study aims to determine the influence of the density of the prick off, over the growth and the economic productivity in green house cucumbers. It was found that the plants grown by the four-row scheme expressed the best growth display. The most production from first class formed the cucumbers in the four-row scheme: 7499 kg/ha-1 in 200% nutrition, and 7071 kg/ha-1 in 100% nutrition. The results for the total yield were identical. The plants grown in four rows with 200% nutrition and with 100% nutrition, exceeded all other variants by total yield, respectively, 8639 kg/ha-1 and 8344 kg/ha-1, and with lowest values were the cucumbers grown in two row scheme of growth - 4736 kg/ha-1. No significant differences were reported in the values of the indexes showing the average mass of the fruits from first, second class and total yield. With highest percentage of first class yield were the cucumbers, grown by the four-row scheme with additional nutrition (87.2%), followed by the appliance of the same scheme, without increasing the nutrition (85.9%) and the lowest part of production from first class, according to the total yield formed the plants from the two-row scheme of growth – 63.3%.
Keywords: Cucumbers; Defense F1; Density of sowing; Nutrition
Citation: Arnaoudov, B., Boteva, H. & Arnaoudova, Y. (2025). Optimizing technological elements when growing cucumbers in non-heated green houses. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 31(4), 772–776.
References: (click to open/close) | Akintoye, A., Adeyemi, O. & Adedipe, R. (2002). Influence of nitrogen and plant population on yield components of cucumber. Crop Research Hisar, 23(3), 493 – 500. Choudhari, M. & More, A. (2002). Fertigation fertilizer and spacing requirement of tropical gynoecious cucumber hybrids. Acta Horticulturae, 588, 233 – 240. Duncan, D. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11, 1 - 42. El-Shaikh, K. A. (2010). Growth and yield of some cucumber cultivars as affected by plant density and royal jelly application. J. Hort. Sci. Ornamen. Plants, 2, 131 - 137. Hana, Y. & Adams, I. (1991). Staking fresh market cucumber for higher yields: A long term research report, Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 104, 237 – 240. Nguyen, T. T. H. (1989). Plant density effect on processing tomato yield. Training report, TOP/AVRDC 1989. Nnoke, N. (2001). Essentials of Pedology and Edaphology. Fedico Ventures, Abakaliki, Nigeria, 71. Velkov, N. & Pevicharova, G. (2016). Effects of cucumber grafting on yield and fruit sensory characteristics. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 103(4), 405 – 410. Wanna, V. (1993). Cucumber yield response to plant density and spatial arrangement. Journal of Production Agriculture, 6(2), 253 - 255. Ylimaz, E. & Gebologlu, N. (2002). A research on growing of cucumber and squash as second crop. Acta Horticulture, 579, 307 - 312. |
|
| Date published: 2025-08-27
Download full text