The role of small-scale farming for local economic development and family incomes: The case of Land-Source of Income program, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Ivan Penov
Abstract: Microenterprises play an essential role in Bulgarian agriculture. However, in recent years, there has been a decline in the number of small family farms. Among the reasons for this trend are limited access to credit, consultancy, and EU funding compared to the larger farmers. In the present article, an evaluation of the impact of small farming on the local economy is presented. The sample includes Roma farmers participating in the Land-Source of Income program. We find that small farming has a strong impact on the local economy, generating substantial cash flow that is often unnoticed not only by the State but also by local authorities. The Land program also contributes to the creation of this cash flow. The findings in this article suggest lessons for small-scale farming that go beyond the researched area: (1). The economy should be seen as an ecosystem of micro, small, medium, and large businesses. Therefore, the policies must optimize the entire ecosystem, not a particular group of actors, or industries (2) this ecosystem consists of the different types of participants and the legislative framework, in which they operate. Small, medium and large businesses interact on local markets, and this creates the cash flow in the system (3). It is not easy to separate the effects of the programs from those made by general economic development, but attempts in this direction can help us to understand better the socio-economic processes we research.
Keywords: Ecosystem; Isolated communities; Low-income farmers; Support programs
Citation: Penov, I. (2023). The role of small-scale farming for local economic development and family incomes: The case of Land-Source of Income program, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 29 (Supplement 1), 3–12.
References: (click to open/close) | Centro for Strategy Evaluation & Services. (2010). Evaluation of the Indicators of the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Pro¬gramme Final report. Kent TN14 5WT, UK: Centro for Strategy Evaluation & Services. Retrieved 9 4, 2023, from https://ec.euro¬pa.eu/cip/files/docs/eip_indicators_evaluation_finalreport_feb¬ruary2010_en.pdf. Coppedge, R. O. (2011). Income Multipliers in Economic Impact Analysis. (T. Crawford, Ed.) Department of Agricultural Eco¬nomics and Agricultural Business, New Mexico State Universi¬ty. Retrieved 25 5, 2023, from https://pubs.nmsu.edu/_z/Z108/ index.html. Garbarino, S. & Holland, J. (2009). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results Issues Pa¬per. UK: Governance and Social Development Resource Centre. Retrieved 9 4, 2023, from https://gsdrc.org/publications/quanti¬tative-and-qualitative-methods-in-impact-evaluation-and-mea¬suring-results-3/. Gertler, P., Prema, P., Prema, P., Rawlings, L. & Vermeersch, C. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition. Interna¬tional Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0779-4. Martínez, C., Puentes, E. & Ruiz, J. (2016). Micro entrepreneur¬ship support programme in Chile. International Initiative for Im¬pact Evaluation. Retrieved 9 4, 2023, from https://www.alnap. org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/microentrepreneur¬ship-chile.pdf. Penov, I., Georgiev, G., Grigorova, D. & Trendafilov, V. (2012). An integrated model for supporting small businesses or how to help disadvantaged families to secure self-employment income. Plovdiv: Makros. (Bg.) Retrieved 4 17, 2023, from http://land¬sourceofincome.org/en/%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B-B%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0 %B8-%D0%B8-%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5% D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8/%D0%B¬C%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB/. Penov, I. (2015). The influence of direct payments on the behavior of agricultural producers in Bulgaria. Scientific works of Agrarian University, LIX(5) (Bg). doi:10.22620/sciworks.2015.05.016. Penov, I. & Georgiev, G. (2021). Entrepreneurial Support for Social and Economic Inclusion of Families Living in the Rural Areas of Bulgaria. Ikonomika i upravlenie na selskoto, 66(1), 3-10. Retrieved 8 26, 2023, from https://journal.jaem.info/page/en/de¬tails.php?article_id=511. Training and Development Agency for Schools. (2010). Impact evaluation – a model. Guidance and practical examples. Train¬ing and Development Agency for Schools. Retrieved 9 4, 2023, from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/10956/1/impact_evalua¬tion_model_pack.pdf. Ubfal, D., Arraiz, I., Beuermann, D., Frese, M., Maffioli, A. & Verch, V. (2021). Implementation and Impact Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Support Services in Jamaica. Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved 9 4, 2023, from https://publica¬tions.iadb.org/en/implementation-and-impact-evaluation-entre¬preneurship-support-services-jamaica. White, H. (2009). Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271-284. doi:10.1080/19439340903114628. White, H. (2010). A Contribution to Current Debates in Impact Eval¬uation. SAGE, 16(2) 153–164. doi:10.1177/1356389010361562. White, H., Sinha, S. & Flanagan. (n.d.). A review of the State of impact evaluation. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank. Retrieved 9 4, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/ dcdndep/37634226.pdf. NSI. (2010-2022). Indicators of poverty and social inclusion in 201 0,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019,2020,2022. National Statistical Institute (Bg).
|
|
| Date published: 2023-12-20
Download full text